Back to home

Resources

Multi-Document Processing for AI Agents

Extract meaning across documents, not one file at a time. Give your agent the ability to compare, verify and reason across related documents.

A purchase, an invoice, a contract or an application rarely lives in a single file. Claix lets agents process several files as one operation and return the result the workflow needs.

Feature documentation

The real problem

Important information is distributed across files

An invoice shows what a supplier charges, not whether the goods were ordered or delivered. A contract defines the original terms; an amendment changes them. A form contains an address that has to be checked against another document.

When each file is processed alone, the application receives isolated outputs and has to build the intelligence layer itself: match fields, compare values, find contradictions, detect missing information and decide what matters.

Document A → extracted data
Document B → extracted data
Document C → extracted data
        ↓
Match, compare, detect gaps, decide

One task

Several documents, one business question

With Claix the workflow starts from the question: do these documents refer to the same supplier, do the totals match, which quantities differ, what changed in the contract, which offer is stronger, does the application match the supporting files.

The result is not only a pile of extracted fields. It is an answer based on the relationship between the documents. Ask for a boolean, a string, an integer, a timestamp or an array.

Documents
+ Business question
→ Cross-document processing
→ Structured result

Do the totals match? → false
Which fields differ? → ["total", "quantity"]
What is the renewal date? → "2027-10-15"

What Claix adds

Compare, detect, verify, then act

Read the endpoint reference for the request shape: up to 10 files, typed questions, and optional context retention.

  • Compare documents

    Invoice versus purchase order, ordered versus delivered quantity, contract versus amendment, application versus identity document, quotes across suppliers.

  • Detect inconsistencies

    Different names, addresses, dates, quantities, prices, missing clauses, or a fact present in one file and absent from another.

  • Verify before an action

    Read, compare, verify, decide, then act or escalate — before approving a payment, opening an account or accepting a claim.

  • Less application-side matching

    Express the comparison as a question instead of building field-matching, normalisation and conflict rules for every format.

Compared with separate extraction

Isolated fields versus one case

Separate extractionMulti-document processing
Each document is handled independentlyDocuments are processed as one case
The application compares outputsClaix answers cross-document questions
Developers write matching logicComparison is expressed as a question
The output is a set of isolated fieldsThe output reflects document relationships
More orchestration per fileOne call can produce the comparison

Who it is for

Teams that decide from a set of files

  • AI agent builders

    Finance, legal, procurement, onboarding, claims, compliance, operations and support agents.

  • SaaS products

    Expense, procurement, contract, insurance, onboarding, compliance and support tools that accept customer files.

  • Fintech and insurance

    Invoice matching, supplier onboarding, payment review, loan checks, and claims that mix forms, photos and receipts.

  • Legal operations and agencies

    Agreements plus amendments, due diligence, and client workflows that should not need a new comparison pipeline each time.

Use cases

High-value document sets

  • Invoice matching

    Invoice, purchase order and delivery note. Compare supplier, quantities, prices and totals, then approve or escalate.

  • Contract and amendment review

    Original, amendment and schedule. Identify changed dates, pricing, obligations and conflicting clauses.

  • Customer onboarding

    Application, identity document and company information. Confirm matches, request a missing file or escalate.

  • Insurance claims

    Claim form, report, images and receipts. Check dates and amounts, then route the claim.

  • Procurement and policy

    Quotes in different formats, or a policy against an expense report and receipts.

  • Support and hiring

    Email, screenshot, log and invoice — or resume, application and certifications — reviewed as one case.

Agents

How agents use the result

The agent is not only a document reader. It can verify before acting, work with the case as a whole, and return a match status, a discrepancy list, a missing-document list or a review task.

A missing comparison is not the same as a mismatch. If the files do not contain enough information, the agent can request another document, ask for clarification or mark the workflow incomplete instead of deciding without evidence.

Process
→ Compare
→ Detect issue
→ Explain the issue
→ Escalate or continue

Not RAG

Multi-document processing versus RAG

RAG helps an agent find information in a knowledge collection. Multi-document processing helps an agent understand relationships across the files in a case.

RAGMulti-document processing
Retrieves from stored knowledgeProcesses the files submitted now
Designed for repeated queriesDesigned for a specific document task
Usually needs an indexed collectionDoes not require prior indexing
Retrieval is the central operationCross-document extraction is the central operation

Optional persistence

Temporary cases, or context you can ask again

Most comparisons belong to one request: upload, process together, return the result, finish. Documents do not have to be stored first.

If the workflow needs follow-up questions, context can be retained. The default stays lightweight and temporary. Your application still owns the business action: approve, reject, create a task, request a document, update a record or notify a reviewer.

Frequently asked questions

What is multi-document processing?
It is the ability to submit several related files together and extract, compare or verify information across them in one operation.
Is this a RAG feature?
No. It processes the files submitted for the current task. It does not retrieve from a pre-existing knowledge base.
Can it compare different formats?
Yes. A call can combine supported formats such as PDFs, spreadsheets, Word documents, images, text and audio. See the multi-document documentation.
Can it detect contradictions or missing information?
Yes. Ask which values, dates, quantities, names or terms disagree, and which required information is absent.
Does it replace business logic or human review?
No. Claix compares the documents. Your agent decides the next action and can escalate when evidence is insufficient, a file is unreadable or documents disagree.
Do documents need to be stored first?
No. The core workflow processes the files in the request. Optional context retention is available when you need to reuse them.

Give your agent the complete case.

Upload related documents, ask what needs to be compared and receive the cross-document information required for the next action. Multiple documents. One workflow. Cross-document intelligence.